Bigfoot

The Scales of Sasquatch, does a giant primate live in North America?

The idea of a huge 10 foot tall hairy beast running around in North America is a hard thing to take for most skeptics to take and I do not blame you at all, however any skeptic I have met after going through the evidence has changed their mind or will sit on the fence however with a much more open mind to the subject then before and privately have said they exist.

 I will go through why they cannot be and why they can be then you being a now informed skeptic then make your choice based on evidence you have read I also encourage you do do your own research any local places that a person lives in usualy has some kind of tales of some sort.

Forward for Author

Many skeptics claim there is not enough forest to hide these animals, the author was astounded by the amount of forest area in BC and other near by provinces and states and whole armies of Sasquatch could hide undetected, the author got lost in a back road near a major city in BC for 9 hours and all they witnessed was forest and terrifying roads and finally made it back to civilization, after that experience and finding a truck from the 1940s  below a abandoned bridge that seemed to have never been found or disturbed and the author had no idea were they were or how to find this truck again and a bridge that seemed it was going to collapse underneath them, as well as driving by a lake and witnessing some large bear looking animal presumably drinking water on the shore line, also almost hitting a Ram one time and a mountin goat another day just off the trans canada highway and this was all in a 10 day period lol, the BC forest he is sure can hide many things and even a skeptic like himself must admit it is possible after what  he had witnessed.

Author

I am a very skeptical human being in most ways, however I have witnessed things in my life that are so improbable to me yet were true , I research many subjects and fish species is my main expertise although I do know my mammals and most other species, I especially love studying new species discovered and these interests combined with a healthy dose of skepticism leads me to do this research.

I would be happy if the Sasquatch was real or not, however it would be more fun if it is  and after many decades of research and interviewing many great animal experts, rangers,cryptozoologists and numerous witnesses they have all with things i have witnessed have made me make a conclusion to this mystery.

People like Bob gimmlin with the famous Patterson film, John green ,Doctor Grover krantz, Bernard heuvlemans the legeandary cryptozooligist and scientest and many many others over the years as well as collecting reports from news sources ,searching through hundreds of Library archives, emailing ,mailing and chatting with everyone from tourist guides to rangers, government archives etc and most of all the infamous Patterson film  which I have watched a zillion times lol and that still boggles many peoples mind.

Peoples opinion that are experts have spoken in favor of the Sasquatch, scientests  of many fields have spoken in favor because of evidence they know is real in their field of science and  sceptics should not discredit them as much as they do and I do not discount them in most cases i respect their work,experts like the amazing doctor Jayne Goodall who has spoken of the Bigfoot phenomena on radio shows etc.

Jayne has been reported to have spoken in favor of this animal publicly being real,If any one should know whether or not Sasquatch is likley real or the Patterson film is real it would  be Doctor  Jayne Goodall ,also remember she has spent more time with apes then any skeptics I am sure that we know of , if a woman of such high respect and knowledge of apes habits thinks they are probably real then maybe we should listen?

Some new scientific tests have been done on the Patterson film and solved the few last questions I had about it and as well as several hair samples that belong to no known animal on earth have been identified as ape like in structure and definably of some ape species unknown to science.

Also remember the gorilla was not thought real for 2500 years and not until the 1800's was the legendary beast proved real ,another tail thought not real the mountain gorilla not until the 20^th century was it proved ,again if you think about it that was not that long ago and considering this great ape if real walks on two legs and is much even more adapt for escape then gorillas are and probably live a more singular life stile as adults then gorillas do on average.

This then shows how they still evade us as well and fundamentally there is nothing against the possibility of a great ape living here, in South America reports of giant apes for centuries, this creature could of easily traversed in to north America or possibly by land bridge from china, if it is what many researchers feel it is, a gigantopithicus blackie, this was a large walking upright ape that was suspected to be over 10 feet tall and was contemporary with giant pandas, giant pandas are real and were not discovered unti 1930's, as well a new species of panda was discovered recently in china so since the giant panda lived with this ape and has survived until today and only has been recently discovered and i am sure most would agree they would be much easier to capture then a 10 foot tall super strength ape like creature that lives in very remote forests, so right away it is easier to except it could be if you think about it in those terms?

Then this begs the question?, hairs are real and we all know they are made by a real animal and therefore even a scientist cannot dispute their own scientists in these fields , therefore after reading this peace and also going on places like you tube who have the Patterson films Mk davis stabilized version so you can see many of the things mentioned in this peace and many other forms of evidence that I will show you that can all be with stood under great scrutiny.

I also ask all scientist to read the amazing report by a fellow scientist, it is called the Nasi report ,it was done by a forensic scientist called J Glickman , in this peace he writes about a amazing amount of tests he did on the patterson film and he proved the final few questions I had about the authenticity of the film and now I have no more questions for me the answer has been resolved.

 

"The mighty Sasquatch"

The idea of a huge hairy ape like beast 10 feet tall  more or less sure boggles the mind of most normal people any where they are spotted let alone North America, however until the  20th century most of the west was still very uninhabitable and to this day millions of hectares of forest exist in locations across Canada and the USA that is rarely if ever traversed, also the fact if these creatures are real then obviously they would have to be naturally shy and probably very intelligent and may know who we are and what danger we impose to them.

If this is the case and the fact that they may be nomadic and hide in high elevation caves and make nomadic treks they probably make  beds like gorillas do, some  reported to be bigfoot beds have been found including one with a hair sample that belongs to no known animal on earth and is a ape species, this much they can tell and if they are real animals they probably have always been low in numbers and may live along time as well and if real are built for speed ,strength and with great hearing probably and sight as well and the fact that most hunters carry 22s or similar weaker firearms this shows the odds of anyone capturing one if real is beyond remote.

If they truly know how to avoid us and likely they do and with so much evidence in favor of it then on that note with literally thousands of sightings and giant foot prints with strides sometimes over 7 feet or more and showing that the animal walked ,not jumped with different toe inflections in each prints and it also is showing mid muscles in the footprints and vein lines and other fine tuned details with super wieght some times over 800 pounds to 1000 pounds would be required to sink the depth  that some footprints have been found.

It seems highly improbable for a human to fake all these things at the same time properly with ought some showing to be fake in some way ,especially if the tracks that were found were in remote areas one report by a James a hewkin a bioligist for the government had found footprints and other evidence in a super remote area of the cascade mountins and he even concluded that there was no way some faker could of made the evidence  and the fact that it was in a area that you can not get to by roads, then this begs the question if they are fakers doing this then they have to be able to fly in to remote areas with no one in the town knowing they have come and then have invented some super sophisticated device that can make differnet toe patterns and footprints and strides of up to reported over 8 feet in the most remotest areas and then get back to civilization and hope that some one by fluke may go and find the spot by accident hiking or whatever on the spot were they made this phony track, this would be super expensive to do this around the country and many remote prints have been found for hundreds of years and for seemingly no money making reason these fakers do this, if it is fakers?

In 1811 a explorer found 14 inch footprints by 8 inches wide in alberta and they had no claw marks and just a very short nail imprint in the toes, no bear in  North america is known to get  that large and also normaly speaking grizzlies and polar pears kodiaks all fall very short of this size of prints as well grizzlies have long claws and it being way in the interior could not of been a polar bear likely, the explorer never had heard of sasqautch and thought it was a giant bear maybe, the people with him did not and said it was not a bear track, I think it was not either and may have been one of the earliest reported sasqautch tracks found by a white man before the name was even known and gorillas had not even been discovered yet.

In the 60, 50s and before some real amazing tracks were found including some that have details in them that fakers never had used to this point and still cannot match some of the details today and  even when fakers try they cannot acheave the weight and stride to sink the phony prints they make in to the deep mud or what ever ground and along with this and  hair and fecal droppings that have  life forms in it that do not exist in any other north American mammals fecis we will go through much kinds of evidence.

This then shows as well that some unknown animal is out there and of course the best evidence of all that can be studied by all, the mighty Patterson film.

This subject causes so much arguments amongst so many skeptics and followers , the things I have witnessed  and others on the patterson film  and many other evidence,I would say it would be impossible to say sasquatch is not real and prove it, however if you look at the evidence it is much easier to prove it is likely real then proving it is not.

I personally think within 99.99 percent probability that the Sasquatch is real, and I will show you why

I have no problem if some one can prove that the Patterson film or any other evidence is fake, I am not a full believer in most stories and take a mass majority of them with a grain of salt.

I have interview dozens of people by email or in person ,phone, letters etc that have claimed they have witnessed a Sasquatch or so called water monsters or some other odd animal and some of them I am sure were telling the truth.

I want people that are skeptical to go through some evidence and then think about all the reasons it could or could not be and then maybe you can come to the conclusion as I have that within hi probability it is real. 

One peace of evidence most of all convinces me it is real and that is the Patterson film ,this film was shot in bluff creek in October 1967 on a Friday when many hunters and fisherman go to these areas and would have been a silly location to hold such a well put together fraud, if it was a fraud which all the evidence shows it is not .

This film was shot by Roger Patterson and below is many reasons  I know that the Patterson film  is most likely  real in the highest form of probability ,I have watched the film thousands and thousands of times and many have froze the frames thousands of times as well, most still do not understand the full evidence of the film and so i want to put it in a logical order and also other types of evidence to co berate the Patterson film .

I think most  Bigfoot sightings are mistaken animals etc ,however at least 20 to 30 percent of sightings are by very qualified people of different sorts that make above average wittinesses and these people along with much evidence that most skeptics are even not aware of and there is plenty , so I am simply putting forth some sound reasons as to why it is within huge probability that a unknown large anthropoid ape like animal is real and decades of study has convinced me this is the case, we will before the Patterson film start off with ancient sasquatch. 

 Ancient  Sasquatch ,this picture below is from a medical text found in mongolia and  not one of the thousands of animals listed in any of the tibetan animal books list any fancy creatures made up like in Europe, all of them are very accurate to the real animals description, so then this means that if all the other thousands of animals are all described properly then why would this one not be?

In china they have been selling gigantopithicus teeth for a variety of illnesses in some medicine shops, some seem to be of not very old origin and if one was to hunt in these old medicine shops and also in local litreture they may find more referances of old days of this creature ,they may have been more common then as well, the wildman was used in medicine the meat was to be eaten and it would treat mental diseases and his gallbladder reported to cure jaundice and also these animals were thought to be around if truly a Gigantopithicus blackie at the same time as pandas and they are still alive so even scientest from fossil records state that a huge walking primate named gigantopithicus blackie roamed china at the same time as the panda and I would think it would be easier by the reported creatures habits and size to elude us then pandas as I mentioned before.

The woodwoosen, this European wildman was reported for centuries in Europe and although some artist would do fancy pictures that were not accurate of some species however many were and does not mean that the wildman was not based on some fact. 

 

 

 The wildman.

 

 

 

 

Orang pendek ,my buddy from Sumatra which I am sure is fully real.

Tales of Sasquatch like creatures are nothing new and they have  been told throughout Europe ,Asia  as mentioned and many other countries, some for thousands of years, , even a king owned a wild man in Europe, another king owned a Orang-Pendek ,the wild ape man of Sumatra which are still being seen today ,the last reports of wild men of the woods from Europe are in the 15th century possibly 16th century early 17th, although there is a few wild men tales up to the 19 hundreds and even some today but very rare.

Even a vampire Sasquatch lol ,old records in Transylvania speak of a wild man that was captured in the Transylvania's forest  in the 1400s and was kept at the royal court ,so you have to ask why would a royal court have records of a hairy ape creature captured and kept unless they did, there would be no logical explanation for them to make it up ,monsters were fully thought as reality back  in those days and very likely many tales were true , a hairy ape man would be no more magnificent then dragon tales and stories like this make  many convinced a real wild man lived in Europe at one time and maybe in a micro few places ones may still exist however highly unlikely.

China still has reports today and so many countries around the world have tales of a wild man, the wood-wosens and other odd names, most meaning man of the woods sort of idea,  some of these stories may have been based on a true creature and in some cases may have been passed down through story and may have been used to make children behave and may be a universal urban legend based on some fact and also that parents would not of been educated like today on average.

In ancient Europe they would of not wanted their children playing in the woods, they may get attacked by unknown creatures  and we all fear places and things we have not seen and so it is logical that such a tale arrived in different areas however I think they were based on some kind of real wild man creature.

There is even old drawings and other paintings and pottery like objects doing a very good likeness of a Sasquatch type creature, how could they know what one looked like unless at one time they really lived? although they are not fully showing a Sasquatch in detail like the European old drawings do if you look at native north American tribes?

There is even records of several old stories of dead Sasquatch  like creatures being found or killed even some eaten ,one in Russia was captured and even had mated with a human, this story if real and very likely could be than likely it is probably a ancient man that is naturally hairy to protect against the cold and is more animal like in nature, this may not make them uneducated in fact maybe they could be really intelligent and may be able to know that we would be danger to them and because of their great strength etc they can smell us, hear us way before we can get close to them they can hide or flee and only rarely when they are occupied with something a odd sighting happens.

There is near 10 tales I can find of dead Sasquatch or live ones being captured ,most are old European ones and a few north American ones as well.

Native tales are full of mystic type properties and many of them treat him more like a spirit although they know him to be a real monster of the forest, many researchers go around looking for primitive Native drawings that look like a Sasquatch to help prove its long history of sightings.

The pottery and different paintings etc so far found show none really look exactly like a Sasquatch, although some make a fair duplicate of what one would look like, if we think they are real ,however drawings of wild men from Europe and Chinese writings or hand drawings by artists from Europe , then you have to ask yourself?

Why would they make something like that up that long ago when all kinds of mid evil creatures lived in the forest they claimed, i doubt it so I think there at least was at one time wild men for sure existed.

When settlers from Europe first came over to the US  The tales would of been passed down to different people through travelers in the early years and then later in the 1800s, they may have also seen gorillas when first discovered or tales in articles about them, or they had gotten the story from their parents who immigrated from England or other European areas and they would spread it over time as the areas developed and forests were less and less, in the east especially and maybe some adults not wanting to scare their children never told them the stories and they were mostly forgot and only rarely told.

Some that had been to exotic lands may have seen monkeys or apes of different sorts and just put the story what they seen in the area they lived etc and the people would use these tales to scare the children in to behaving  and  kept the story going.

One story that is very interesting is of eve walker he had written in the 1600s he tells that these hairy wild men would come down from the mountains and they smelled like a skunk, now I find it amazing he knew this feature that was not widely mentioned or  more known until the1970s mostly and was several hundred years before gorillas hit the seen of science and so no such a tradition of apes known being spread as a story yet by travelers ,now this little story gives me the thought Sasquatch may be real ,I find it hard to fathom he made that up.

The Teddy Roosevelt story of a man being killed by Bigfoot in a book called the fronter hunter, that story is really odd and creepy man was found dead by his trapper friend who said the creature left giant man like footprints and had visted their camp several times, I wonderd if they realy did see a sasquatch and the hunter when seeing the huge prints got the idea to kill his buddy for his loot and then blame it on  the real giant prints they had witnessed it would of been  a convienant way.

Another story by Albert Ostmans ,he got kidnapped by a family of Sasquatch and escaped by feeding one snuff ,another story from a man before the Patterson film described in great detail about a woman Sasquatch he witnessed his name was William Rowe that was eating a leaf  and every thing he said to the tee is in the Patterson film and I think that story is real, and then when the footprints were found in the 1950s and the beginning of the modern era of tales started again and then the Patterson film which interestingly just before it was shot some 15 inch footprints had been found in the blue mountain area which is near bluff creek and Patterson had heard about these new footprints found and they started looking around that area and had never been there before more about that below.

Numerous tales exist of Sasquatch attacking humans now mind you most were in the older days, this may have been based  on what I call “the catch and kill theory” now back in those days even if some one witnessed a Sasquatch they may embellish the story or may have seen one or heard of ones from Indian tribes trappers etc.

Many of these sort of tales were  more known then and maybe some were used for a cover up for murdering  people and then blame it on a hairy beast or if they seen one and it walked away well thats not to fun of a story so they just embellish it and maybe actually did see a Sasquatch and maybe it is possible that a few rare Bigfoot may do this.

I suppose if a Sasquatch is real then they would be like  most other animals or people would not harm any one however i am sure some would , the same with dogs most are friendly some breeds are naturally mean and may attack people and so maybe simply a Sasquatch felt threatened and being so powerful it is hard not to fathom them easily hurting or killing some one.

 

Stories all over the world of similar creatures have been reported and even some sightings in the Ontario region and Quebec, I know it sounds wild but never the less there is some, reports are of many kinds and will be told below ,, some I do not take serious except in thick remote areas or unless the story has lot's of side evidence to take it seriously, however the rest of the evidence I do and I will go over many aspects of it and put it in a logical way as best I can.

Alabama over 30 sightings Alaska 15 Arizona 32

Arkansas54, California near 400, Colorado 75, Connecticut 2 ,Delaware ?, Florida over a hundred probably way more maybe in thousands, Georgia over 20 probably way higher, Hawaii some ape like creature was spotted a few times not really a Sasquatch more like a monkey on the loose or primitive small man  2 sightings ,Idaho has remote areas, a famous sighting occurs back in the 50s, I can track over 40 sightings in Idaho and Illinois has probably in the low hundreds most are more like unknown or known smaller primate, Mississippi over 50 ,Missouri the same there probably is way higher amount  many sites that keep reports have numerous ones weekly just about so all these are much lower in numbers then amount of sightings there really is,all other states have reports as well of either Bigfoot or similar type creature.

All provinces have Sasquatch reports and of course the big one is BC, however they are reported everywhere.

My theory if these animals are real is that Ont ,Quebec and many states have thinner trees, BC ,Oregon ,California have giant redwoods etc that have a much thicker diameter then most thinner trees of the far north or in Canada in most areas and also BC and close by provinces and states have much more wilderness and mountain regions suitable for this creature if real and therefore more likely hood of them being able to thrive undiscovered, other sightings in smaller treed areas are of low numbers and for short periods of times ,this makes sense to me anyhow that the animals are just going through the area and do not inhabit it full time if real.

The great legendary beast known as Bigfoot , Sasquatch and many many other names even local sightings exist I know that seems unlikely never the less they do more on that later in local.

The evidence for this unproven creature fully  is very good, even some samples of hair and stools with microscopic life that is not known in any species in North America or the World and have not been able to be identified and this proves that some animal unknown to science is real.

What it is  that is speculation?, however I am convinced it is a unknown giant primate ,there is amazing reports from all over the world of many variates and types I have concluded that if these animals are real that we can actually break this down and show logically how there could be so many varieties.

What would happen if bigfoot was proved real ?

What if Bigfoot is captured in your region?

We or he or she may want voting rights ,especially if proved to be human or sub human and in the near future maybe he or she or both could run for office? and what rights would he or she have and what if they wanted to work and what would be the minimum salary for a Sasquatch be?

I could see wrestling promoters all over getting in on the action as well ,come see harry the Sasquatch versus the great Khali and psychologists analyzing what goonie goo goo means or what ever they say lol.

 I could see fast food chains getting in one the action as well" try the new MC-Squatch- veggie- footsie burger", served to you by a real Sasquatch  ,anyhow I hope no one captures one around here the chaos in a political town such of this magnitude would either drive the citizens or the Sasquatch or both to run for the hills lol.

We will first start off with some areas that Sasquatch has been reported and some basic info.

They are between 4 to 18 feet tall, a few over 20 feet tall are reported on in the matto grosso region of south america is reported to have a club and over 21 feet tall that is one scary ape man like beast lol , most bigfoot are brown to black in color of fur , they weigh between 300 to 1500 pounds, most likely 400 to 800 would be average.

They may weigh more then this, many skeptics say they could not find enough food, this is silly some bears get over 2000 pounds and they find food.

They have no or little neck much shorter then humans ,it looks like their head sits on their shoulders, and they have a cone shaped head, the face is ape like with large eyes some times small reported as well, color from red to black eyes, little hair on some areas of the face, no hair on bottom of the feet their soul area, longer hair on head, in some parts the hair is less thick in the mid section of the chest.

In some cases they are reported to be a smaller variety that maybe another species or young Sasquatch that may not be born with the cone head and they may look different as a child and maybe through teen age years they may develop this cone on males and females in adult hood.

They are spotted just about everywhere, however most people that do take this serious think"BC" sightings, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California, is more likely to be possible states and also Florida-Georgia, however that is more of a different issue, more later about that, also some traditional Sasquatch tales in Florida who knows,anything is possible in fact On and Quebec has large amounts of untouched areas  and even sightings more on that later.

I have watched the famous Patterson film so many times until my eyes were blood shot in the hopes of catching something phony on it and to date I cannot, I have watched many documentaries and been in the woods near all of my life and read about most species you can find in North America and I am a keen observer .
Below some of the things I have noticed and have been mentioned many times and observed many times by others.

What I am doing here is listing what  most of us see when we look at the film, if you are a keen observer and if you  are super skeptical and will not even allow your mind to look at it, then your really are missing a amazing thing  make sure you pay close attention and watch this movie and the more you do the more you will be convinced it is real.

Here is some key things about the film that prove within hi hi probability it is real.

Roger Paterson had heard news reports of some giant footprints found in blue mountains region and he and Bob gimmlin searched around the area of bluff creek right beside the blue mountains area and likely this was the same animal as roger filmed ,many have suggested fake yet they have nothing to back this, here is just one of the reasons before he even filmed this animal there is evidence pointing to it being real and many more reasons below they all add up to 100

If he really had made the fake film then he also had made the blue mountain tracks, this was the same animal footprints the exact same they both were roughly 15 inches long and same width and stride roughly, the terrain of course slightly different with small variiance and from all known records he had never been to the blue mountain spot at the times of the find of the other footprints, this then means likely if it was fake then this same individual left these footprints in the Patterson film.

Some tests have been done on these prints and most think they were the same animal as Patterson filmed ,therefore why then has no one proved they were the one in the costume or came forward and then also this person would want money and therefore by now could make a fortune telling how they made the suit yet no one can and b then this means roger could not of been the one leaving the footprints and then if it was a faker roger and bob then may have shot at it as far as the faker knows.

This makes you wonder?

If this movie is fake, then roger had to have others involved and if so then they still would not know if bob would shoot the actor in the suit ,again this seems improbable and many other odd peaces of light evidence to show it may be real and the argument over this film has never stopped since and if even one of these people are telling the truth of a sighting or the Patterson film is proved real then I have no other choice then to except the fact that it exists.

One little known thing about the film most see the later cut up versions for TV and these cut out some of the original films frames showing even more proof it is real.

In the early part of the film Patterson is running to catch up to the creature and  a large branch that was in his way in the film he bumps in to he then stumbled a bit and then he backed tracked and as he was doing this the camera catches the ground for a moment and shows a very deep footprint  also on the same slide you see Patterson's print were he just backed up and you can see Patterson's shoes while running barely indent the sand at all ,yet this print goes near several inches in the ground, this means this creature if it was a man in a suit then he had to of weighed a massive substantial amount more then  Patterson to make such deep prints I am sure even the mighty terminator arny could not walk with a thousand pounds on his back at the speed this animal does even in the conan days and i am not aware of any human that could do this ,they have strong man compatitions and these people can lift a 500 or more pound weight for a few feet ,even the strongest man can barely carry it any great distance and since this is the case then you can see after veiwing this peace of film and all the other evidence there is no human on earth that could of moved that fast and fluid with the wieght required to sink the prints.

Many tried to cover the distance shown  by the Patterson film, by walking like the Patterson ape at as fast a pace as they could go or run  and all of them could barely cover half the distance of what the Patterson creature does in time and speed, all together I think there is 11 footprints found in the Patterson film if memory serves me correct this moment ,many tried jumping on the ground with heavy weights on their back and could barely indent the ground even patterson was running and his print barely makes a dent in the ground at all more like a line print.

Another key part of the film is you see when she turns the breasts on the left hand side bounces for a second very natural and woman like and no material at this point in 67 could of made such natural movement, as well you see the breast bounce and it is definitely not attached like a costume would be.

Some skeptics state the Patterson film could of only been done by a human who had hair glued directly to their body now if this is true then this means that the person in the fur was a female human and as far as I am aware of no woman on earth has legs like this or shoulders this wide let alone a man and so this theory would be impossible for numerous reasons below. 

You see natural skin and the breast itself is not attached from outside like gluing 2 parking pylons to your chest or highly highly unlikely threaded in to the chest in some fashion,  it looks exactly like a females breast would look like attached to a human in a totally natural way and in the right position, as well.

The  other breast barely moves at all in that frame, yet in another she moves slightly and you see it bounce as well, yet much less then the other did because her turn and body movement is much less when she turns and her whole body  in that frame shows this and you see the left breasts bounce because she swings her body so much more of a turn and with more authority in the other one.

The breast bounces much more in that frame then any of the others, this means to me that if it was fake he had to of been able to make a natural breast implants in the suit that were made of some kind of very life like material and some how attached them to the suit in a way that they look like part of the animals skins and not attached by the front like some one putting to balloons on there chest.

Also to of moved in such a natural way it would of been similar in structure to a breast implant made of saline or if some suggested he wore a animal skin then he would of had to of fitted this suit like a glove to a human being  that has muscles in areas that humans do not show and was 7.3 inches tall minimum and width wider then khali the wrestler to give you a idea, no such a person existed then that could have been this size with muscles like that or today some are taller however none meet the width and muscles and arm length and foot span inwidth and very few in length required to make a actor be able to do this .

The femur muscle ,you will never find it pronounced like that in a humans like you see in the Patterson film, so even if it was a man in a suit then he would of had to of made some special phony muscle for it to make that effect and as well other huge muscles in spots humans do not have.

Reportedly Roger was asked about the femur muscle and according to some he did not even know what one was until it was pointed out to him, and this man was not a known  expert on animal anatomy, as well he spent his last days still hunting for the creature using money he made from the film, he could not even afford to pay for the agreement of the camera, no one has produced the suit, and this film to me and many others clearly shows the largest and last great North American  animal and only primate although evidence also shows of more smaller ape like animals living in the US as well.

If you add this and many other things I and others have noticed and with some things I mention that i have never seen put forth or very rarely mentioned and I would not doubt others have thought these things as well though ,here is some more things about the Patterson film that makes it 99.9999 percent sure it is real.

Recently some one said they thought the Patterson film was fake because the buttocks muscles were different then known apes or humans and way to muscular  ,they  then started showing native ,Africans and South Americans with large rumps, they were  trying to show us  differences between their behind and Big foot's.

 I kind of was shocked and laughed, who is to say what a big foots rump should look like lol,  or any other race of humans or apes, many differences occur in man and nature of odd physical attributes, they show photos of different tribes comparing rear ends of humans.

Bigfoot is not a human or a Gorilla likely and therefore may have completely different body needs then other apes or even humans and therefore no one can say with any authority what a big foots rump should look like or act, and therefore although interesting theory it holds very little water to me and many others, the Patterson film depicts a unknown giant primate probably related closely to gorillas,instead of all these people trying to prove it is fake they should focus on how it could be faked and proving it or excepting it like I and so many others have that it is real.

In the Patterson film although a crazy subject it needs to be included because even though it sounds silly it is evidence, the muscles inside of the behind cheeks are moving in and out as it walks and it is very similar to gorillas, if it was a made up behind area then ask yourself  ?

Who would go through the trouble of making a large natural looking behind crevice with muscles inside moving, now common this was 1967 costumes were not that developed and still are not able to duplicate almost any of the Patterson apes look, also throughout the film you see massive muscles in the back ,arms, legs, shoulders , this is amazing if you think about it and this is way beyond what any special effects people have been able to do to this date,I  am so convinced this is real footage  of a natural animal for many many reason here is some more.

The animal in the film looks like a animal not a person in a suit" it walks different", it's shoulders are way to wide and arms to long for a person in a suit. 

When the creature turns,  you notice it turns with the body, humans do not do that their neck is way higher then the shoulder and humans will turn their neck if they have to look to the left or right.
This creature has to turn its body because the neck is super short and its head almost rests on its shoulders.
When its feet can be seen in some frames,  you see it to have a white soul and some people of said they should not have this, why that is a silly response many animals have white souls, you see different toe impressions in the tracks, the footprints found on site had dermal ridges in them they are like fingerprints and no phony ones showed up until decades later and were easily found to be phony.
The head of the creature with that pointy skull, it's eyes are animal like, the nose is similar to an apes yet flatter and very wide and so many more things will appear to you the more you watch it.

Instincts, although not scientific sound, you ask anyone who is very intuitive or a mother when they get a instinct something is wrong at the house and they are right, these feelings can be very strong in some people,  I am very instinctive person and they often are right my instincts,i have also heard this comment from others that all the other movies they get nothing from this one they get a gut feeling and i to get this feeling it is real.

Also every other film I have watched I get no eerie odd feeling, I get nothing but laughter, I look at this girls face and I get this look of intelligence and concern ,she may have had her young near by, no other film has gave me this feeling even my gut tells me it is real although it is against my skeptical nature yet it passes even that.
The Muscles in its leg going in and out ,the texture of the skin makes it look real and many more things if you are willing to look.
Now I am sure many of you looking at this film if you have a open mind and view it many times you may have noticed many if not all of the same things I have?

I have seen many reference to some of these points as well and so we mostly are all seeing the same things, which means that we all have the ability to watch a film and tear it apart and yet no one has been able to fully prove it phony or one hundred percent real until now I think it shows 99 percent at least within hi probability, I find and most others if they research it will find it authentic more then fake?
One of the things amazes me the most is how it walks and the spacing of the hair on its body, now who ever made this if it was fake they had to really know the full details of what a Sasquatch is to look like and fully understand animal locomotion and have a suit that is beyond technology known today and then.

Why would they pick a area like this that was traveled by fisherman ,hunters etc and how could they get the money needed for this?
So many questions, I find the film more a mystery then the Bigfoot itself all most and we all ready know if they are real a some what fair amount about their details and where they live likely.

The Patterson film what they look like for sure and how they move,  yet with all the modern technology if some one tries and duplicates this film it is poor in comparison every time and we still cannot make this films quality to this day so how could that be?
Keep a open mind and try and disprove it  I do not blame you as I said I do all the time, make sure though to look carefully.
 I am sure many will start to realize this film is very significant and I wish you luck because I do not think any one can prove it is phony and as I said it seems it has been proven real within the highest of probability.
This film if it did not exist I would never even give this subject a thought, yet this film does and it is the most amazing film, there have been some stories of  several claiming they were the man in the suit.

However, many have looked at the evidence and believe me I want it to be fake and proven so i can stop  following this crazy creature lol, however the evidence stand up under all scrutiny and  no one has brought the suit  and no one can provide any proof that they made the suit and all of their stories have been fully debunked so our of no use ,now common if you made the most famous suit in the world and you are knowing you will be not around much longer would you not of showed someone the suit or how come he never took a photo of it or how it was made?

Who would not do that, anyone that is a hoaxer would be proud of such a great hoax they pulled, yet no evidence what so ever that any of these people was the one in the suit except a few people saying they said they were in the suit.

Why did they wait all these years with such a great secret , most people would love to tell one person they know  a secret of such magnitude, yet these allegations of different people that were in the suit were made in recent times except a few older accusations ..

The BBC had this phony Bigfoot show claiming they could duplicate the Patterson film and it was really bad and it would not fool anyone, yet they had hyped the show for a long time before airing it and telling the world they solved the Bigfoot Patterson film,  thousands of readers poured in letters asking why they claimed they solved it when anyone could see the one they made was fake and so to this date no one has been able to make a film like the Patterson film, I will go over this below and it is the main reason I think it is real.

Another reason for the authenticity of this film,I have watched about every fake monster movie you can think of from hairy and the Henderson’s to the creature of the black lagoon and none of them can remotely get near the quality of this film and this was shot with a cheap rental camera and with no special effects of a studio etc.

Yet everyone argues about the reality of this film, no one would argue about Harry and the Henderson if that film was given as proof of Bigfoot no one would believe it is real.

Even though it  was Disney it still cannot come close to believability as this film and they had millions of budget these 2 fellows had nothing. 

Now, adding that in to account does this not sound impossible that 2 men with no funds and a cheap camera can make better quality films then Disney?

I highly doubt it, I have been a Disney fan since childhood and I love their brilliant work and they are the best around and so this leaves me only 2 conclusions either they actually filmed a real Sasquatch in bluff creek? I hate to admit this however I think the film is probably real?
I have froze the frames as it walks many times and every time I notice new things, that convinces me that either Roger Patterson and Bob Gimmilin were amazing  fake artistes and had the expertise to pull this off I highly doubt it for numerous reasons.
I talked to Bob and I found his method of speaking real and he seemed like he was telling the truth however I am not a 100 percent firm believer either and I often find myself compelled to believe and to disbelieve it is a hard choice and I would be happy either way although it would be more fun if it is real?

So many other factors to this film makes it the king of unknown animal films, one thing that is interesting is that the monster has breasts it most likely would be female although some of those old men you see with their shirts off at baseball games  get those b- tits as the young people call them now a days lol, all kidding aside though if you notice over the years almost all reports of Sasquatch are male, why would that be and if the film was fake why would they have not made it a male considering almost all reports are usually a male.

A Sasquatch story told by William Rowe, he described in great detail a female Sasquatch he witnessed  and it matches the Patterson films female too a tee, he spotted this creature in the 50s and as far as my understanding this story was not released until after the Patterson film and that other wittinesses had heard the story from Rowe previous to the Patterson film and it never faltered so it seems so improbable that a person sees a Sasquatch at close range for a long period and notices fine details about the anatomy of the creature and the Patterson film shows all these things he mentioned and more.

This is the only story that I know of that long ago besides the Austmans  kidnapping that gives such detail  although not as much anatomy detail like Rowes was with such detailed descriptions of the creature or creatures in Austmans case.

How would Patterson know these details to put in a suit? especialy  when no stories except Rowes had such fine details which he could not of known about because it was not public knowledge at the time, now this is not evidence fully however it is very interesting he describes the same things as the Patterson film in a way for the Patterson film it authenticates it more and for himself as well they both match in detail .

This in itself makes me think it gives a little extra credence that it could be real ,also when the creature is walking in some frames you will see the hand change by the Sasquatch curling it's fingers and the way it does it is typical of apes ,humans normally would not do this as they walk, it also walks with a very fluid yet unman like walk, it bends its knees much more then humans  do ,as you can see in the frames of the film.

This along with foot prints ,the speed of the gate and many other things I will mention gives this film super hi likely hood of being real.
Here is a theory  that I think is  within reason proves this film to be likely real. 

 I think that if something is wrong with a story then it will show itself to be none real ,as a for instance if you take a story  for fun we will use a giant lizard, if a man tells of a lizard that eats ice cubes and takes cold showers and is 50 feet long and lives on Mount Everest then you know within a 99.99999 probable percent that this cannot be.

 A Lizards on average do not like the cold

(B)

 They do not like cold water on average and  cold showers, water would be frozen in hi elevations ,so even if he describes the lizard accurate in the physical appearance, He did not know enough about the imaginary animal to pull off the story and he also put it in a silly area that very unlikely a lizard could live of such great size with all the plains going by over the years you would think one or 2 would be spotted.
So the story failed in believability, because all most any one knows that most known lizards do not like or thrive very well in cold climates except in a few rare instances, so naturally the story falls apart quickly in yours and anyone’s mind that are familiar with lizards and especially  if it is living on the highest mountain in the world and 50 feet long.

Although skinks and some small similar types do live in some hi mountain snow regions however none over a few feet long or so,

Hi areas of course the food would be sparse and very unlikely a creature like that could live and get so large, even if a yeti as a for instance if real and likely it is, it only goes over these mountins to reach other valleys ,they live in the valley for sure  in the deep forests in the valleys and only cross mountains to get to others, so you can see this story does not add up, now on the other spectrum you have the Patterson film which in all levels adds up we will go over some of the evidence.

Here is  more reasons the Patterson film is likely real.
A
 It was reported that the film was made with a rental camera or leased and they owed money on it, if you put that in to perspective this means that two guys with no money and no Hollywood filming expertise some how made a film that even hard core skeptics think it is highly well done, now  it was reported they could not afford the rental and owed late fees so how could they of made such a high quality film?

If they had backing maybe?

One story claims that a relative had 1/3 part in any gain Patterson would make investigating Bigfoot but research showed the bills were payed for some expenses however from all known records this is all the person supported, it is not likely even with backers a person could of made this film, they probably would of never rented a camera ,they would of bought one or the secret movie study of course would have had to have there own and so why rent a camera.
B
Roger  from what has been reported was not a highly schooled man however he was a smart man and knew how to promote himself  however no one that met him thought he could of had the skill to make such a amazing film and he had not much money so how would of he afforded such a highly crafted suit?.
C
It was reported that Bob his friend who was with him when he filmed it has never received as far as  any one knows money from that film directly, now if you done this fake film with your buddies why would you risk them not telling on you and why would they not tell on him ripping them off  like that, of course they would ,almost anyone would be mad at making a film with someone and not getting their rightful cut of the film and yet Bob still swears to this day that he and Roger witnessed that Sasquatch
D
As  was reported before not even Disney has been able to make an actor walk and move like that creature on the Patterson film how could this be?
 

E

The Patterson creature if Phony and unknown to bob and only to Roger Patterson's backers, then they would have had to have a actor in the suite, now why would backers and Roger take a risk like that with this actor?

If Bob was not aware of this, how would they know how he might react?

Even close friends would have a hard time guessing how anyone would react to seeing something like that and of course you are in the back woods and you know they carry guns, what if bob had panicked and leaped off his horse and shot the actor in the suite ,who would risk that?

Roger and Bob were close buddies and not likely even the actor and or other investors would be risking some ones life to pull off a phony film.

Many people have done heavy research in to the Patterson film and all the facts about the film can be found at many many sources and many tried to duplicate the movements and tried to jump with people on their back to sink in as deep as what this Sasquatch was doing and they could not.

Many people were on the seen early and made amazing casts and some even had hair line stuck in one of the casts and these prints show amazing different toe movement and the depth of the footprints could not be achieved by people jumping with 2 people one on another's back , jumping of objects and they still could not reach the depth, the stride was only possible for them jumping and that included some that were well over 6 feet tall  and so how come the creature is walking it is not jumping.

If this was a person in a suit then they had to be super massively wide ,wider then the mighty Giant and had to of had the widest most powerful legs in the planet, if you constructed these muscles and made the body this wide with a person in it, it would move totally unnatural, unlike the Patterson film which is very fluid as you can see watching it, also it shows it to be able to walk in a none human manner for a long length of time and show all the muscles it has as it walks, it's arms are much longer then a humans could be and also you see hand movement which means then if fake they had to of created a device that could be extended to reach the hands and a humans arms are way to short to do what the patterson film does .

It seems so unlikely that some one could make this all work together so fluidly and it has not been done before or since, no one else can make a movie this good not even close.

The people that investigated it their findings show as well it seems impossible to be faked and the foot prints matched exactly with the film and the creatures walk,they were made by the creature in the film for sure and were not made by a fake wooden foot so this answer is impossible.

The people that claimed they were Sasquatch in the suit, which there have been several over the years as mentioned through nout the peace,none of them could of done this, they were not heavy enough to achieve this and they could never have moved the speed this animal does with the weight that was required to make the prints, and also the movements would be beyond their ability or anyones by that matter .

The walking gate is extremely hard for a human to do only cross country skiers come close to this walk and although close not the same and there pushing the poles and the skies cause the bending and therefore none of these people usually walk this way , and your body naturally would want to walk normal and this walking gate its totally inhuman .

They also of course have no evidence at all of fakery all this time, not one shred and so as you can see this film is still one of the worlds greatest mysteries for sure.

Recently I watched this Bigfoot show  I don't remember the name of it this second and they brought  this skeptic young TV Guy with 3 other members and he was going to show the world how easy it could be to  make a Bigfoot suit.

He made the most poorest quality looking suit, but this is typical they all do because there seems to be limitations as to how convincing you can make one ,once you see the film you could  know he looked immediately fake and no one on earth would be fooled by that suit.

Although his idea in concept was not bad though and the suit design was thought out a bit, he put padding inside  to make it more beefed up looking,  now once he put it on  he kept tripping and wiping out and he could not take the heat of the suit for any length of time he was so wiped out from the heat of the suit he finally gave up, now even after learning all this and even after watching the Patterson film he still could not admit how brilliant the Patterson film  was and how  how poor his was in comparison .

Yet he seemed to be proud at the end  of the show that he made this terrible film and convinced himself that the Patterson film could be done and his was close enough to the Patterson's film in quality for him he thought any how, now anyone including him  would not be fooled by that suit  yet he played to be still fully skeptical because that is his job on the show and he does it well.

The cast is very entertaining and I enjoy watching the different view points, I would love to join them in a quest it would be a blast and  I am sure even if a Bigfoot jumped in his tent and gave him a big kiss he would still not except it lol , yet he seen evidence that he could not even remotely reproduce and of course no one else can either and still plays skeptical.

I think this is one of the most best peaces of proof of all is that a intelligent guy like him and many many others over the years could not accomplish making a believable Sasquatch suit and this is one of the best evidence to date.

I thank him and all the other makers of phony Bigfoot films for reaffirming my thoughts on this films validity even further and I hope many more shows have people that are super skeptical they make it easy to more prove the animals more likely real by what they cannot make.

More evidence

Dermal ridges found in the foot prints are like human fingerprints and found in some tracks of the patterson film,Roger swearing to his death bed he witnessed it  and it was real and most of all he even spent all the money while he was alive chasing Sasquatch ,why if it was phony would you spend your money on going after something that you know is not real and why has the actor or the person that made it never came forward with the suit.
Also if you could make such a high quality suit for film then you could easily change the hair color and adjust the costume to be a male or smaller or bigger and make more movies yet this never happened.

Why not if you really are that good of fake artist surely you would want to cash in on your skill and show movie directors what you can make.

Also any of the people that have claimed they were the person in the suit not one of them can show how it is made.

Your skills would be highly desired and you would make much more money then just showing that one film or even if you did not want anyone to know it was phony you would make more movies to authenticate yours and make more money yet he did not do that and no one else has either.
If you add all these facts and that Russian and American and other scientist from around the world that have bothered to have studied this film many have been willing to make a public statement it, and some believe it to be real for different reasons, so I do not feel I am in that bad of company.

 Hair samples have been found and some experts in other fields have scientific evidence that cannot be disputed and fully is excepted in the science of that field and some of them  except in the Sasquatch not because of the film although that helps but because of the science they are in ,they know that the evidence for their field could not be faked and it is real.

The ones that do not except the film, cannot give any reason as to why they do not ,they just say it must be fake yet they cannot give any examples as to why it is, therefore if you add up all these factors then they fit together to make a very believable story and therefore it makes this film much more likely real, if it was made up I am sure some of these peaces would never have fit.
The most impressive thing to me is the way it walks as I have already mentioned, if you watch all the phony Sasquatch films you will notice none of them can even come close to the locomotion abilities of that film.

There have been many movies of Sasquatch from wild  snowman to a big foot that captures girls and makes them his love slave, some are super funny, then you have many films reported to be a real Sasquatch yet are so low in quality that they leave little doubt they are fake or that they do not show clearly enough to prove one way or the other they could remotely be real, the Patterson film is the only film that can stand the tests.

Many years ago I remember watching some movies made by this fellow that were Bigfoot films and a documentary style movie about Sasquatch  now he was very entertaining individual to chat with, if you can ever find this movie it is so funny he makes it like a Disney documentary style with cougars and all kinds of animals.

The best part and funniest in the movie , he says some thing like or close to this saying,it was many years ago I seen it,   I was walking  up the mountain and there was the glowing eyes of Bigfoot, then he says oh sorry it was glowing peat moss on a moose’s antlers lol or something like that, this may not be hundred percent accurate it fails my memory the exact terminology he used it was close to this.
Another part of the movie you see a Sasquatch from far away popping its muscles in a weight lifter pose something like you see when a guy uses his arm and flexes his muscles to impress the ladies, maybe if it was real it was showing that pose in hopes the Patterson girl Bigfoot  from bluff creek on vacation in Alaska would come out of the forest lol.
In the movie it also shows the crippled Bigfoot that was supposed to be the Sasquatch that made the Bossberg cripple prints however he was the one that had found with a few others the Bossberg cripple print,  many think Bigfoot is real because of this print.

However the films are all thought not to be authentic by most experts and so this begs the question about the validity of the bossberg crippled print as well.

Many have researched all the available films out there made by many different people and none can reach the Patterson's films quality, they have not even scratched the surface of believability like the Patterson film, yet the crippled footprint found by the movie maker and several is amazing and  considered by many to be real.

If it was faked then he had to have had a very intelligent mind to come up with this and he got all the things that were needed in the footprint to convince many hard core skeptics and just because some one is intelligent does not mean he made them, they could be real the prints that he found  with other people.

Many suggested he then after finding the real prints made  the movie to cash in on the print find, the movies though cannot show enough detail for me to make much comment on them except that I loved watching the.

I really enjoyed chatting with him  and he was very funny and he was one of those guys you would love to have you tell a tale or two at the local campfire, he could tell you some real  life stories to he said he had tracked cougars and other animals and he was very good at it.

I have no idea if he is still around and I am not saying he is not telling the truth, in fact I found him very knowledgeable however if you look at any other film around they are so far removed in quality as has been said by many compared to the Patterson film that it makes me again think that may be this is a real animal we are seeing on that screen when we look at the Patterson film, this is why often I will except in it and often I  wish I did not, I wish this film was never made it haunts me I know what a animal looks like I know what gorillas and other great apes look like and I also have watched many many films and witnessed wildlife all my life and it sure looks to be real, 

So many people  have been researching this whole episode and talking with Bob Gimmlin and others I have huge doubt that he has not told the truth.
I also have met a few people that have witnessed or claimed to see a Sasquatch and after interviewing some of them then I have no other conclusion then to except that maybe they really have seen something?

I hope not the idea of a huge hairy ape living among us sounds so silly as well that humans are this unaware of are surroundings that we cannot even catch a large animal like this sure makes it hard to believe, yet as I have said the evidence if you choose to research it with a open mind will be very strong and hard to dispute logically and even in my region there has been sightings more on that later.

Sighting distribution in other parts of Canada
Often people tend to put the stories of Bigfoot in a type of setting not often in their downtown areas or city areas,  they will put it in a area that Sasquatch is supposed to live in.

Is this because they really seen it in this woods area ? Or they know that is were it is supposed to live and report it or because of the shear size of some forest areas sightings are less with little human intervention and little human inhabitants or maybe that is why that so little reports come from these provinces.

Another possibility is that because population is low in Canada that  Sasquatch could very likely go through  these provinces and not be detected except in very rare instances. They may just travel large areas like nomads but may group more in Bc ,Washington ,California, the Florida skunk ape is a whole other matter this to me in most cases seems to be a separate issue concerning a maybe unrecognized or known species of primate that lives in the Florida everglades and surrounding region more on that latter.
Here is are several stories of people I have interviewed some are probably telling a good old fashioned whopper two of them sounds  what they said could be real, I am going to tell you about  some people that believe they seen a Sasquatch, I am sure some of the others probably have not and at the end of the site.

I will show you a example of some recent discoveries proving a long thought extinct native Canadian and North American animals has been proved to exist and more examples.
Here is some stories of people, I have met that never have been in any published book and are unknown except to a hand full of individuals
Story 1
 This couple Willie and I am not sure the wife's name, I think her name was Susan it has been so so long, they lived not far from me at the time and I use to walk by their place to go fishing and they had a cute dog and I would pet it and they had no children and was a younger man at the time and they kind of took a shine to me.
They use to live in BC and they worked in a logging camp and one day they had stopped for lunch and a bunch of them were sitting around this bench
 Now they were in a valley below a mountain looking up the slope when this huge ape like animal came over the ridge and numerous people all seen this thing walk along the edge and then disappear around the bend.

 From objects they remember seeing the animal walk by they were sure it was at least 10 to 12 feet high, reddish brown in color, walked up right like a man and had a pointy head ,now I thought this sounds so far fetched  yet knowing them made me think maybe they really are telling the truth and after years of research I am sure likely they were? 
It was to far away to get any better detail and after hearing this the first time over the few years I knew them I would always ask Willie this story again and again and every time it never changed, his wife and himself  were serious people and I doubt the type to tell such a yarn.

Another person I met from California, she said in the mid 1970s she was camping with some of her friends and this Bigfoot was spotted by them as they were looking over a ravine and this hairy large animal was drinking water on the edge of this lake below them, it then stood up, they thought it may have been 8 to 10 feet tall or more and very wide, then the creature walked like a man in to the forest.

She seemed really serious and kind of scared and a excited look on her face, she said it was near some place called Klamath overlook, I don't know were it is in California ,I also have interview some local people that have said they have witnessed a Sasquatch more on that later , here is just a smidgen of the eyewitness testimonies of many people from all walks off life such as.

People of just about any kind of profession, some have spotted a hairy ape like creature, how could this be that people with such hi quality jobs that require a healthy mind would say they seen these things?

There are only a few reasons ,either they really did or they have cracked or they have sever mental issues or maybe some one with a odd sense of humor.

Normally these peoples opinions are gathered as credible in court rooms etc ,especially if in official status such as law enforcement yet most will say they are crazy when they report these things.

Do we really know that much about are world? I often doubt it and I cannot fathom how such credible people such as these could be lying this then would make a mockery of our system, this then would mean that the truth is a lie and the lie is the truth so to me this is good evidence that they may be real , the caliber of witnesses in many cases are beyond reproach .

What if you knew your Mom and Daddy have always been hundred percent truthful to you and always have been good to you and have always showed themselves to be very level headed and very swift and truthful, what if they were driving home and a Bigfoot  ran in front of them and then they stopped the car they had a clear amount of time to see him, they could tell it was not a human in a suit, they said it was 10 feet tall,they measured it against a tree in the background and it took off and ran in to the forest.

Now lets say you have been a skeptic all your life, would you now think Bigfoot is real? if your Mom and daddy told you and swore  they seen it?

If  I was in this situation then I guess I would have to become a convert that it is real ,would it not be more improbable knowing your mother and dad all your life and since they told you the story they still do not lie to you?,if you think about it then in general this would be evidence to me and many many mamma's and daddy's have seen a Sasquatch.

Many wittinesses have been women which to me would less likely make this up, many female and male wittinesses have been well respected people in the community and known for their knowledge and good deeds so why would people like this make that up?

Many people wonder how could this be that this animal is alive?

The theory put forward often for this one.

The amount is just a figure there could be way more or less. 

What if a very small amount  of Sasquatch that had reached over the land bridge from the east or possibly from south America, some great unknown ape or when the land bridge closed they got trapped, they may have been slowly going extinct overtime.

Since mans first introduction to Sasquatch or maybe not? in all reality there is no evidence exists on how many there was or is if they are real and from all the evidence so far as you can see they highly likely are.

What if there were only a small amount of them left lets say 200 or so and that they know full well who humans are and can sense they would be in danger from us, now they are said to live far from man and maybe even close to him in some cases , many villages towns etc are surrounded by forest,a Bigfoot I am sure can hear some one coming from far away and be long gone, their smell ,their agility and grace through the thickets would evade man and dogs with ease and no man or hunting dogs could match the swiftness of this creature and it would outdistance you by miles in no time.

 

 

Here my buddies the Sasquatch are running in to each other for mating season ,most males reported or females are usually alone and males out number females by a huge margin in sightings.

Another interesting anecdotal evidence is that still till this day males are witnessed 50 to 1 or more, many skeptics claim UFOs are made up because they see what they are supposed to look like and report them same with Bigfoot or Nessie, however the only good footage of the Bigfoot is the Patterson film, yet still most sightings are male.

If they were mimicking what they seen then most sightings would be female, so then it seems to me anyhow that if Bigfoot is real then females are way less in numbers and that is why males are reported more often or b for some odd reason people cannot handle making up female Bigfoot, they must only make up males ,this seems very odd behavior of humans if they are making it up.

 

 Why are they reported in so many places

If they are real and likely from reports they may travel migration routes,  this could explain odd sightings in states that should not have sightings with such small Forest areas ,maybe they had a migration route and maybe they live really long time 100 to 200 years ,or more and maybe now that buildings and what have you may be in there old migration route area then it would stand to reason they may get lost or confused and this is why from time to time humans have sightings of Sasquatch in other states, they are simply going to some other area that use to be forest.

Males may roam the country side, looking for new females to breed and may be forced to travel through states along Forest lines that at one time use to be Forest and they would not stay just be lost or trying to get some were else they are not human they do not know the difference from Texas to Florida they know by the Forest.

They find a mate and maybe for life, if they have successful off spring maybe they shelter them in caves and share responsibility maybe the male hunts, this would explain the rare sightings of younger Bigfoot or that the female raises them and guards them and they may inhabit caves or other hidden areas.

Also mating may occur very rarely and just enough to keep them alive, if you think about it then i am sure most would agree they cannot be overly common or sightings would be more present, they must be in some what of lower numbers compared to deer or  or moose or they would be seen  way more often then they are. 

The young may develop fast ,this could explain some of the smaller 4 foot sightings you hear off maybe this is the first time the young adult leaves on its own and the odd sighting occurs.

And since they live in thick forest usually and do not approach man and hide and likely humans only running in to him at night or in rare instances if the creature is going from one place to another and also maybe the wittiness being down wind of the creature in a clear area and not making much of a sound to aware the Bigfoot only in cases like this would sightings occur,  this could be a feasible explanation as to why Sasquatch has not been captured they are low in numbers and smart.

Many cases exist of animals living in heavily populated areas being discovered by science and some have been large mammals including several speices in my region that  is highly likley to be unknown to science and so i figure  since a Sasquatch if real seems to be a large ape that would live in thick forest and since i have personaly witnessed a few species that seems to be not known then in my eyes it could be real, we do have thick forests and we do have enough food etc.

Also look at many animals, do you see a wolf running down the local street? These sightings are very rare  or Moose, even deer stay away normally from humans , if Sasquatch is real? then it likely is a highly intelligent creature and that it knows that man has bad intentions for them and it is best for them to stay away from humans.

Hunters do not bring with them elephant guns in the bush of"BC" or were ever and many tales over the years of Bigfoot being shot at  and I highly doubt with the muscles of this creature and a size 22 gun  from a fair distance would maybe not even sink enough to cause bleeding, even if it did the odds of killing it would be near zero and it would quickly run in to thick forest and may die ages later never to be found.

We as humans are coming closer and closer to eating away the forests and last refuges of these last mystery animals and if any of these are real I hope we can discover them before it is to late .

Manimals, there is a great older book with this title, the authors put it together very well and well documented these are many cases of ghost like Sasquatch, another odd group of sightings is were these Bigfoot creatures appear in peoples windows or other urban settings and disappear in front of the wittiness.

I do not bother researching they are to far freaked out and hard to track for me, I want to chase a live creature not a creature with ghost like properties, these sort of tales are well documented and then you have to ask if so many people see these sort of sightings as well are they really any less reliable then people seeing a real animal in their story.

On the other hand who is to say they are a ghost, if a wild Ape or Sasquatch like creature came to a window at night they I am sure could move fast and the witness may not  be fully focused and confused by what they are seeing and give it supernatural  powers when in fact it simply ducked out of sight fast.

If Bigfoot is real what is it and is there more then one variety?

Could they be Human?, I really highly highly doubt this the Patterson film and from all the descriptions clearly suggest other wise and I am really surprised that some people think that they are human ,they look nothing like human they  look like a undiscovered large unknown or maybe known by fossil record as a gigantopithicus blackie primate.

I am sure if they are real that is what  they are, it fits the description to a tee ,they probably came from china were as mentioned are still being seen, they were a giant primate 10 feet tall or more and there you have it is a Sasquatch it make sense this is the most likely candidate

In Russia however in some mountainous regions of Russia and near by countries do seem to be of two varieties, one is like the Sasquatch  and the other seems to be much more like primitive man they may have 2 mysteries in that region as well there are smaller kinds as well that have been seen.

The Russian papers  tells reports all the time and they are very common also Russian scientist and Chinese take this more serious and many more of them find it feasible that such a animal exists. 

Then we have the smaller apes that are reported in many areas across the world, these may be simply low population species that are shy and hide from man , these ones are even easier to  except in, it is much easier for a smaller species of ape to hide in thick Forest than a large ape like species  like a Sasquatch .

In North America there is many sightings of other ape like creatures that seem to not fit the Bigfoot profile and are a different mystery

I also find it odd that there is also many reports of other types of apes and maybe a unknown species of monkey or more like the Miaka beast that seems to be real ,it looks like a orangutan   however some things of it do not and it may be the best evidence I have ever seen of a unknown primate or known primate living in a  area they are not known to live ,except for the Patterson film this is very clear photos and is highly likelty not fake,these photos are super clear and leaves almost no doubt at all it is a real animal .

In Illinois there is a place called Kickapoo creek and it has in some places this thick swampy Forrest that is super creepy and sightings of primates have come from this area and a few others in the state this area now a days may be built up more I have not heard of a sighting in some time maybe there is still some going on?

There are so many researchers now even more then monsters lol however ,they all have there own stories and reasons for doing this, so many others I have chatted with or contacted are real nice people.

One who filmed a Ogopogo has spent many years of dedication chasing these things and I am sure he fully excepts them to be real and he knows what he seen I was there and I did see going by the lake on the highway above it a large wave we thought it was odd because no boats could be seen anywere however it may have been from before and so I do not take it as a sighting, I did run in to one person steve from near kelona area, who said  he and a lady friend sighted this animals back on the surface in the 19 80's he thought it was 19 82 in the summer, I was looking out on the water and these people were fishing i started up a conversation and jocked about ogopogo he looked at me serious and said it was real and he and a friend witnessed it,, it was black only about a couple feet wide and about 10 feet of it's back was showing and it went across a chop going up wind in the southern section of the lake and went down near  nearer to the far shore,  it moved at a real fast pace maybe 20 to 30 miles a hour he recalled.

Now in areas that have many sightings you would think once that you may get lucky with a sighting, this would be a sound approach chasing sightings all over may make better TV , you could do both have a home base area filming for months and other areas visiting different locations, keep a vigil on both and I bet some day one would get lucky.

I would make the location very far from any roads or people and one with a water source that is the only source around for miles this would be a very likely place all animals need water look at the bluff creek video Bigfoot needed a drink and I am sure they all do again if they are real?

One I would be highly interested in going to and researching is the little hairy apes reported living in Sumatra.